Even 38 years after the Maharashtra legislative assembly passed the Maharashtra Casinos (Control & Tax) Act (Act No. XXXI of 1976), which legalised casinos, gaming and wagering, the Maharashtra government has not notified and implemented the Act.

Jay Sayta, a final year NUJS student and founder of Glaws.in, a website on Gambling laws, represented by M/s Hariani & Co. has filed a PIL at the Bombay High Court on this issue.

Jay explains, “It is the duty of the High Courts and Supreme Court to consider cases of non-application of mind and inaction of the government and pass appropriate directions in case the government acts against the letter and spirit of the constitution.

Why is Legalising Betting Good [ACCORDING TO THE PRESS RELEASE]

Various expert bodies and jurists have suggested the economic benefits of legalising gambling and betting, the government has not taken any initiative to enforce the will of the people, as apparent through the Maharastra Casinos Act.

For instance, FICCI estimates the annual revenues to the government from legalising sports betting to be at least INR 19,000 crores.

Jay further adds, “Enforcement of the Casinos Act will help eliminate the financial woes of the government as the government will raise thousands of crores in revenues. Further, citizens will not suffer criminal action for an acceptable form of recreation and a legitimate avenue of entertainment.

The enforcement of this legislation will also ensure that match-fixing and cheating in sport can be curbed by allowing government agencies to monitor betting patterns and take action against suspicious betting patterns.

jay sayta pil on gambling laws
Jay Sayta

About the Maharashtra Casinos Act

The statement of objects and reasons of the Casino Act indicates that legalising gambling was desirable for the purpose of promoting tourism and increasing revenues to the exchequer.

The Act defines casino games to include all games of betting or wagering including games of chance played by means of machine or instruments making it possible to regulate both online and offline gaming.

The Act also provides for a reasonable rate of taxation not exceeding twenty-five per cent to be imposed on license holders and allows the state to frame rules to regulate gambling advertisements, prevent underage gambling and impose other restrictions as may be necessary.


Read a copy of the petition HERE.

Get Lawctopus' posts in your inbox!

I am the Admin of Lawctopus. I am for law students, of law students and by law students. I am Torts and Contracts and moots and internships. I am your boyfriend! And your girlfriend too! Mentor. Friend. Junior. Senior. I am the footnote in your research paper. Foreword in your life. The jugaad for your internship. The side gig which earns you bucks. I am Maggi. Pocket money too.

Comment via Wordpress

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here