International financial Institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund are facing varied economical, financial, political, social and environmental issues today. Their role with regards to the administration of global distributive justice, minimising poverty or aiding in the developmental processes is being called into question. In this paper, the author has tried to expose the internal working procedure of these institutions and the effects of their policies which have been debated vigorously as skepticism looms large in the wake of a worsening economic situation and living standards especially in the Developing and Least Developed countries.
By Hardeep Singh Chawla and Aashna Chawla, Amity Law School Editor’s note: Securitization has undoubtedly emerged globally as an important technique for bundling assets and segregating risks
By Priya Desai, SVKM’s Pravin Gandhi College of Law, Mumbai and Devanshi Sethi, Rizvi Law College, Mumbai “Editor’s Note: A tax treaty is an agreement entered
The TRIPS Agreement aimed not only at protection of the Intellectual Property rights but their due enforcement as well. The Agreement, thus, sets out minimum standards to be established and also provides for the administrative and civil mechanisms for enforcement. These minimum standards for the enforcement of IPR allow right holders to protect their legitimate interests through civil courts or administrative proceedings. However, considering the innovations in technological fields, increased patent filing, new symbols being created everyday and works requiring copyrights, IPR enforcement needs to be strengthened further.
The World Trade Organization came into being in 1995. One of the youngest of the international organizations, the WTO is the successor to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) established in the wake of the Second World War. The WTO provides a forum for negotiating agreements aimed at reducing obstacles to international trade and ensuring a level playing field for all, thus contributing to economic growth and development. The WTO also provides a legal and institutional framework for the implementation and monitoring of these agreements, as well as for settling disputes arising from their interpretation and application. The current body of trade agreements comprising the WTO consists of 16 different multilateral agreements (to which all WTO members are parties) and two different plurilateral agreements (to which only some WTO members are parties).
Over the past 60 years, the WTO, which was established in 1995, and its predecessor organization the GATT have helped to create a strong and prosperous international trading system, thereby contributing to unprecedented global economic growth. The WTO currently has 160 members, of which 117 are developing countries or separate customs territories. Decisions in the WTO are generally taken by consensus of the entire membership. The highest institutional body is the Ministerial Conference, which meets roughly every two years. A General Council conducts the organization’s business in the intervals between Ministerial Conferences. Both of these bodies comprise all members. Specialized subsidiary bodies (Councils, Committees, Sub-committees), also comprising all members, administer and monitor the implementation by members of the various WTO agreements.
By Amrit Subhadarsi, KIIT School of Law, Bhuvaneshwar “EDITOR’S NOTE:- This piece analyses the prospect of liberalization of the Indian legal service market in light
The Indian legal service market is still aloof and not open to foreign law firms opening offices in the country. This is not so in case of other sectors like banking, education, hospitality etc. A reading of the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961 shows that only natural persons who shall be enrolled by any State Bar council and have a law degree from a recognized University and are citizens of India can practice law as a profession. This has been a major hindrance in the entry of foreign law firms into the country. Though, India is a member country of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), it has not taken enough steps to liberalize the legal service sector. Interaction with foreign firms will definitely help Indian law firms to gain a good reputation and lead to increased pay packages for Indian lawyers. Moreover, Indian firms can stay ahead by outsourcing the foreign firms a part of their operations. Therefore, the time has come for India to open its legal services market for foreign firms.
The national treatment obligation in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) is wider in scope but more limited in application than that in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). It is wider in scope because, while national treatment under GATT is concerned with measures affecting products per se, the domain of this obligation in the GATS includes not only measures affecting services products, but also measures affecting service suppliers. It is more limited in application because, while national treatment under the GATT applies across the board, under the GATS it applies only to scheduled sectors, and there too may be subject to limitations. These differences were intended and are well known. An elaboration of the concept of National Treatment would help us gain a better understanding of the reasons behind this approach.
By Mariyam Parveen “Editor’s Note: The paper deals with the dispute settlement mechanism of the WTO as outlined in the DSU (Dispute Settlement Understanding); the
By Surabhi Dhole & Suvigya Vidyarthi, University of Pune, DESFNLC Editor’s Note: The essay starts off by explaining the meaning and purpose of intellectual property. It